For additional information please contact the IRB office at 832.246.0063 or IRB@LoneStar.edu
The IRB is the LSCS committee that reviews and approves protocols for the use of human subjects in research. Federal regulations require that the IRB have at least five members representing a variety of backgrounds, training and experience. At least one member must have no formal or family connection with the System and be invited to serve as community representative.The IRB reviews research proposals to ensure that the rights and welfare of human subjects used in research studies are protected. The IRB assures that
Research is a systematic investigation including research development, testing and evaluations, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. If you plan to present, publish, or otherwise share results of the study outside of the Lone Star College System, it is generally considered research.
Human participants are defined as living individuals about whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual; or obtains data through identifiable private information. Some examples of human subjects/participants include:
If you are doing research that involves people, then you should submit your project for review to the LSCS Institutional Review Board. You might ask yourself, "Am I planning on:
If you answered YES to any of the above, your project is considered research and requires IRB review. If you answered NO to all of the above, your project is not considered research and will not require IRB review.
If no public dissemination is planned at the time the data is gathered, but the possibility of future dissemination exists, you are advised to submit the project for IRB review and approval before research begins.
Once you have determined that you are indeed doing human subject research you must fill out an IRB Research Application Form and submit an electronic copy, along with other necessary documentation listed on the form with Informed Consent documents attached to the IRB office at IRB@LoneStar.edu. Once the application is submitted, the IRB will make a determination on the status of the project, which will be Approved, Conditionally Approved, Tabled or Not Approved.
No research may be conducted prior to receiving approval from the IRB. Any unapproved or conditionally approved research proposals will be presented in writing to the investigator along with any recommendations or suggestions.
Research proposals under review are categorized as follows:
Exempt
Some proposals fall into one of the "Exempt" categories as provided in federal regulations and as determined by the IRB, and does not require full IRB review. These proposals require IRB notification, but do not necessarily require review by the full convened committee. Note: Only the IRB Chair or IRB Office can determine Exempt status. In general, certain types of research are considered exempt:
Expedited
An expedited review consists of a review by the IRB Chair or designee. Proposals that satisfy the regulations may be given an expedited review, as determined by the IRB Chair. The results will be communicated to the investigator in writing and also reported at the next IRB meeting. IRB members may ask for discussion of any expedited reviews.
Referred for IRB review
Proposals that are neither exempt nor expedited are sent to the full IRB for review.
Full Review
Proposals that involve more than minimal risk must go through full IRB review.
Informed consent is generally thought of as informing participants of the risks, benefits and methods of the research they are participating in. Informed consent means insuring that potential subject and/or their legally authorized representatives are fully informed of all aspects of their participation in a research project so as to be able to exercise free power of choice without undue inducement or any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, or other form of constraint or coercion.
If an LSCS faculty member or employee is investigating how to improve educational practice at LSCS, then it is generally not considered "research" as this IRB defines it. However, if research is done NOT as a part of that educator's work at LSCS, is funded from an external funding source, is research is for dissertation or thesis, or otherwise is not part of their work at LSCS, then that project would need to be reviewed.
Certain activities have the characteristics of research but do not meet the regulatory definition of research needing IRB review. For example:
If ALL of the following criteria are met then IRB review is NOT required on the classroom project.
Your project will require IRB notification and formal IRB approval if you do not meet ALL of the above requirements.
Undergraduate research is to be encouraged, and learning the IRB review process is an important part of a college education. All undergraduate research will be submitted to the IRB for review. Undergraduates are to be strongly discouraged from engaging in research that poses more than minimal risk to subjects, as they are unlikely to have received sufficient training to safely conduct such research. Faculty members can encourage course research activities such that students become familiar with developing research proposals that can fall into the exempt or expedited categories.
Students may be involved in course activities such as questioning, participation in minimally physically stressing classroom exercises, observing and/or interacting with other individuals. The course instructor is responsible for determining whether such activity is classified as those kinds of activities that require IRB approval. If the instructor has any doubt concerning the classification of these activities, he/she is encouraged to complete a Research Application Form and submit it along with the project and any accompanying consent forms and/or questionnaires in order to obtain the guidance of the IRB.
No. The sponsoring faculty member must serve as the Principal Investigator (PI) and submit the application to the IRB. The student should be identified as the Co-PI. A sponsoring faculty member is responsible for student research. Faculty will inform students of human subject guidelines and take measures to enforce compliance to those guidelines. It is the responsibility of the supervising instructor/faculty member to determine whether projects are subject to review. It is always best to err on the side of caution and seek consultation from the IRB Office if a question arises regarding human subject research and classroom activities.
ALL research with children including adolescents must be reviewed by the IRB committee. Children are considered a vulnerable population. They are less able to give fully-informed consent with respect to the research involved. Safeguard procedures and considerations are, therefore, required by the Federal regulations for the review of research involving children. In most cases, written consent from a parent or legal guardian must be obtained if the research involves children under the age of 18.
Please submit questions or requests for information here, or take a moment to comment on the usefullness of this site.